Pawar
et al. (2011) conducted a study to investigate the pharmacognostical standardization of leaves of Caesalpinia pulcherrima which is found throughout in India. Caesalpinia pulcherrima is one of Caesalpiniaceae
family, commonly called peacock flower. This plant has many benefits especially
the leaf part. It was used as antioxidant, antipyretic, antimicrobial, and
antibacterial. From the study of Pawar et al. (2011), C. pulcherrima’s
leaves were collected from garden of Government Hospital, India and were
authenticated by botanist. In this study, the pharmacognostical standardization
including morphological and microscopical characters of the leaves, historical
test, powder characters, quantitative leaf microscopy, physico-chemical study,
and preliminary phytochemical analysis. The result of microscopically
transverse section of leaves consist of lamina and midrib region. Histological
test reported that lignine, cuticle and calcium oxalate were substances inside
the leaves of C. pulcherrima. Powder from C. pulcherrima’s leaves
had green colour and presented xylem, phloem, stomata and epidermal cells. The
fragment of lamina showed stomata and venation. Stomatal index was 20, stomatal
number from upper part of epidermis was 28 and lower part was 31. The values of
physico-chemical constants presented total ash, acid insoluble ash, water
insoluble ash, and loss on drying were 5 ± 0.288, 1.375 ± 0.125, 1.25 ± 0.25, 8.33 ± 0.88
%w/w, respectively. Soluble extractives: alcohol, water, petroleum ether,
chloroform, benzene, acetone presented the values were 8.2, 14.4, 1.4, 5, 5, 6
%w/w, respectively. In preliminary phytochemical analysis part presented
flavonoids, glycosides, phenolic compounds, saponins, sterols, tannins, and
triterpenes. In conclusion, the researcher suggested that the pharmacognostical
characters might be useful to support about C. pulcherrima’s information
and useful to prove the standardization criteria.
This
study provides scientific evidence to support herbal medicine terms of the
pharmacognostical standardization of leaves of C. pulcherrima which is
necessary for new herbal drug development. However, there are some limitations.
1) According
to Chanda (2014), in India, pharmacognostical studies and standardization
parameters should be consist of collection of plant materials, organoleptic
characters, macroscopic study, microscopic study and Quantitative microscopy,
powder microscopic observations, historical analysis, physico-chemical
constants, phytochemical analysis, fluorescence analysis. In this study did not
investigate all methods that were an important point to do pharmacognostical standardization.
2) In
physico-chemical constants part, ash value should test total ash, water soluble
ash, acid insoluble ash and sulphated ash. The extractive values that are ethanol
soluble extractive, water soluble extractive, determination of volatile oil in
drug, determination of crude fibre content, determination of loss on drying,
determination of foaming Index should be done in triplicate to avoid an error
of results (World Health Organization, 1998).
3) In
this study, almost figures might not clear enough and there are no scale beside each
picture to confirm any sizes such as the leaves, stomata, epidermal cells, xylem and
phloem that they reported.
The
strength of this study is that study of the habitat, general characters of
plant, their gross, whole and powdered structures, and also chemistry of the
constituents are include in the pharmacognostic study is very important. These
places down parameters for standardization and authentication of medicinal
plants and will prevent adulteration and substitution. These may be useful to
therapeutics in the future also.
References
1. Chanda,
S. (2014). Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An
overview. Journal of Pharmacognoscy and Phytochemistry, 2(5), 69- 73.
2. Pawar,
C.R., Kadtan, R.B., Gaikwad, A.A., & Kadtan, D.B. (2011). PHARMACOGNOSTICAL
AND PHYSIO-CHEMICAL STANDARDIZATION OF CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA. INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY, 1(4), 998- 1002.
3. World
Health Organization. (1998). Quality control methods for medicinal plant
materials. Malta: WHO Press.