Author: C. R. Pawar, R. B. Kadtan, A. A. Gaikwad, and D. B. Kadtan
Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY
Year: 2011
Volume: 1(4)
Page: 998-1002
Abstract:
Caesalpinia pulcherrima belonging to family Caesalpiniaceae is distributed throught out India. Commonly it is known as Peacock-flower. Plant shows diterpenoids, isovouacaperol, sitosterol and flavonoids. The plant is considered as emmenagogue, purgative and stimulant, abotificient and also used in bronchitis, asthma and malarial fever, leaves used as antipyretic, antimicrobial. Flower also shows antioxidant and antiviral activity. The present study deals with the macroscopical and microscopical studies of Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaf. Macroscopically, the Caesalpinia pulcherrima is compound leaf, ovate shape, entire margin and glabrous surface, asymmetrical base, small petiole. The microscopic study showed presence of collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, stomata. Some distinct characters were observed while studying the transverse sections. Physiochemical studies revealed total ash, acid insoluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on drying, alcohol soluble extractive, water soluble extractive and preliminary phytochemical studies of the leaves were also carried out. The present study might be useful to supplement information in regard to its identification parameters.
Reference:
Pawar, C., Kadtan, R., Gaikwad, A., & Kadtan, D. (2011). PHARMACOGNOSTICAL AND PHYSICO-CHEMICAL STANDARDIZATION OF LEAVES OF CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY, 1(4), 998-1002.
Results:
- The
microscopic study showed presence of collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, stomata. Some distinct characters were observed
while studying the transverse sections.
- Physiochemical
studies revealed total ash, acid soluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on
drying, alcohol soluble extractive. Preliminary
phytochemical studies of the leaves were also carried out.
Citations:
1. Pawar et al. (2011) reported that the microscopic study of Caesalpinia pulcherrima presented collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, and stomata. The total ash, acid soluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on drying, alcohol soluble extractive were tested in the part of physicochemical study (p. 998).
2. The microscopic study of Caesalpinia pulcherrima presented collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, and stomata. The total ash, acid soluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on drying, alcohol soluble extractive were tested in the part of physicochemical study (Pawar et al., 2011, p.998).
good job in citation No. 1 .
ตอบลบIn my opinion, you should be change the sentence in citations No.2 to be difference citations No.1,it will better.
Hi K.Suwipa Intakhiao
ตอบลบI think same to K. Suphat and I think that the citation 1 is similar to citation 2, you may be use the passive voice for citation 2.
Fighting.....
Hello Suwipa
ตอบลบIf u need the citation in brief, i may share my idea
Pawar et al. (2011) reported that the microscopic and the physico-chemical studies of Caesalpinia pulcherrima were done (p. 998).
>.....<
A lot of good ideas from your friends!
ตอบลบNot sure what you mean by "presented"; is that a synonym for "presence of"? If so, it's not exactly used that way.